<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>geakz &#187; false statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geakz.com/tag/false-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geakz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Reason&#8217;s &#8220;Top 10 Lists&#8221; Suck.</title>
		<link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geaked</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thinking Out Loud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotional tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10 lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geakz.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Top Ten Reason&#8217;s &#8220;Top 10 Lists&#8221; Suck. 10.) They are usually numbered in ascending rather than descending order. 9.) There is a misconception that a Top 10 list is backed by research, or is written by someone who is an authority on the subject. 8.) 74% of all lists utilize fabricated or false statistical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>The Top Ten Reason&#8217;s &#8220;Top 10 Lists&#8221; Suck.</strong></p>
<p><strong>10.)</strong> They are usually numbered in <em>ascending</em> rather than <em>descending</em> order.<br />
<strong>9.)</strong> There is a misconception that a Top 10 list is backed by research, or is written by someone who is an authority on the subject.<br />
<strong>8.)</strong> 74% of all lists utilize fabricated or false statistical statements.<br />
<strong>7.)</strong> They lend themselves to irritating mutant variations like: &#8220;The Top <span style="text-decoration: underline;">14</span> reasons to&#8230;&#8221;<br />
<strong>6.)</strong> People create Top 10 lists thinking it will drive visitor traffic to their site.<br />
<strong>5.)</strong> More often than not, there are only <em>2-3 good items</em> surrounded by 7 other &#8220;filler&#8221; ones.<br />
<strong>4.)</strong> They lack cynical sarcasm and/or dark humor.<br />
<strong>3.)</strong> Most are written by people who are too lazy to write <em>good content</em>.<br />
<strong>2.)</strong> People use them as <a href="http://www.geakz.com"><strong>self-serving</strong></a>, <strong><a title="Why not subscribe?" href="http://www.geakz.com/feed">promotional tools</a></strong>.<br />
<strong>1.)</strong> They clearly infringe upon my patent-pending <strong>&#8220;<a title="Example of 5-Point Commenting System" href="http://www.junkdrawerblog.com/2008/08/a-mean-jeans-shopping-machine.html#comment-12330">5-point Commenting System</a>&#8220;</strong> found at <strong><a title="good stuff" href="http://www.junkdrawerblog.com">www.junkdrawerblog.com</a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

